<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Singing the Psalms in Worship, Pt. 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worshipmatters.com/2007/03/singing-the-psa-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2007/03/singing-the-psa-1/</link>
	<description>Resources for Leading Worship from Bob Kauflin</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bushong</title>
		<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2007/03/singing-the-psa-1/#comment-6318</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bushong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worshipmatters.com?p=275#comment-6318</guid>
		<description>I'm not an 'Exclusive Psalmodist' myself, but one who in the last two years has begun singing one Psalm per week (usually the whole Psalm, too) in our corporate worship, and am seeing the difference it makes. Just imagine the healthy state of a church who, along with sound doctrine and obedience, sings such militant, vibrant words on a weekly basis? For the next 100 years? Even just one psalm per week, and your men will want to start swinging spiritual 2-handed Claymores and your children will want to scale walls with this robust, God-magnifying faith! Well, maybe it'll take a little while, but it sure beats "I just wanna" sung over and over...

Now that I'm calmed down a bit... Psalm-singing is surely something that we can all agree on- it's the Word itself- and the metrical ones are simply perfect for a big group of people to sing together. Just keep telling yourself:

"One down- 149 to go..."

Of course, #119 is usually sung over a period of weeks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not an &#8216;Exclusive Psalmodist&#8217; myself, but one who in the last two years has begun singing one Psalm per week (usually the whole Psalm, too) in our corporate worship, and am seeing the difference it makes. Just imagine the healthy state of a church who, along with sound doctrine and obedience, sings such militant, vibrant words on a weekly basis? For the next 100 years? Even just one psalm per week, and your men will want to start swinging spiritual 2-handed Claymores and your children will want to scale walls with this robust, God-magnifying faith! Well, maybe it&#8217;ll take a little while, but it sure beats &#8220;I just wanna&#8221; sung over and over&#8230;</p>
<p>Now that I&#8217;m calmed down a bit&#8230; Psalm-singing is surely something that we can all agree on- it&#8217;s the Word itself- and the metrical ones are simply perfect for a big group of people to sing together. Just keep telling yourself:</p>
<p>&#8220;One down- 149 to go&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, #119 is usually sung over a period of weeks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whit Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2007/03/singing-the-psa-1/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>Whit Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worshipmatters.com?p=275#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>I just encountered this while perusing this excellent site.  These 2 articles on Psalmody are the only two with which I  disagree.   While I do not believe that it is not Scriptural to use songs other than the Psalms in Public and Private Worship, I do believe that it is not Scriptural and does tend to threaten Sola Scriptura to sing song other than the inspired Word of Scripture.  I will try to comment later as I have time.   There are difference between Elements and Circumstances of Worship.  A nice example of circumstance is baptizing in a river as brother Dan pointed out.  As R.C. Sproul (not a Exclusive Psalmodist) commented on the Psalms about a "new song", a new song refers back to the Psalms and not to a new, uninspired song.  I will try to give more substantive comments later as I have time.   
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just encountered this while perusing this excellent site.  These 2 articles on Psalmody are the only two with which I  disagree.   While I do not believe that it is not Scriptural to use songs other than the Psalms in Public and Private Worship, I do believe that it is not Scriptural and does tend to threaten Sola Scriptura to sing song other than the inspired Word of Scripture.  I will try to comment later as I have time.   There are difference between Elements and Circumstances of Worship.  A nice example of circumstance is baptizing in a river as brother Dan pointed out.  As R.C. Sproul (not a Exclusive Psalmodist) commented on the Psalms about a &#8220;new song&#8221;, a new song refers back to the Psalms and not to a new, uninspired song.  I will try to give more substantive comments later as I have time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Bixby</title>
		<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2007/03/singing-the-psa-1/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Bixby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 05:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worshipmatters.com?p=275#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>I, too, am sincerely grateful for the spirit of this debate, and for Bob for allowing it. It has helped me to better understand both sides.
It is important that all who worship God have a reason for how and why they worship. Those who adhere to a Psalter only understanding of the regulative principle often bemoan, with good reason, those who will sing just about anything without a strong, biblical reason for doing so. I appreciate their willingness to stress this point.
I believe in the regulative principle – that we must worship God in ways He has expressly prescribed - therefore, I must include in my worship of God new songs. 

1) I believe the Bible commands us to sing our own songs to God. 
Some may say that the Scriptures do not tell us to sing “un-inspired” songs, but I believe they do. There are many examples of spontaneous singing of Praise to God in the Scriptures. Yet we are told that we must believe that those who sang spontaneous songs that were recorded were justified in doing so because they were inspired by the Holy Spirit. That is fine, but it is the flip side I have a problem with: we must believe that those who sang songs that were not recorded were all singing from the Psalter. So Miriam, Hannah, Deborah and Balak, Mary, Zachariah, and many others sang spontaneously, but Paul and Silas did not? It is precisely because of these examples, and because of commands from the Psalter itself (see Psalm 149 – a command for spontaneous eruption of praise to God, even on our beds!) that I believe we must create new songs of praise to God, and do so in a humble spirit, acknowledging that they, like us, are imperfect, uninspired words and melodies. 

2) It does not seem possible to maintain a consistency with this view without making a complete distinction between corporate worship and private worship. There are, no doubt, practical differences, but the differences should not be incompatible. 
I believe that the Scriptures teach that corporate worship should be the joining of many private worshipers. That is, those who worship God in private, seeking to join their voices together in worship as a unified body. It is the "two or three gathered together" principle. 
Even in Calvin's introduction to the Genevan Psalter, he seems to argue that corporate worship (singing) should be a mirror of private worship (singing):
"And yet the practice of singing may extend more widely; it is even in the homes and in the fields an incentive for us, as it were, an organ of praise to God,..." 
His distinction (made later) is rather with songs to “amuse” vs. songs of worship (a distinction most of us would agree with), not songs of private worship vs. songs of public worship. 
If one does see the two as completely different in all aspects, then, at least they can have some consistency, but I don’t see that in the Bible. I believe God deliberately did not tell us what to sing, just like he did not tell us other aspects of church worship and life. 
However, if one maintains that they are related, but believes that the regulative principle dictates Psalter only worship, then how can they consistently apply that principle other areas of church life and worship?
How can they properly take the Lord's Supper? They certainly cannot claim to take it in exactly the same manner as did Christ, or the early church (though few would deny it is an act of worship). Or... is it wrong to be baptized anywhere other than a river (which seems to be the only place of baptism mentioned in the Scriptures)? Why do we not meet on the Sabbath?

3) To use 2 Chronicles 29:30 as a statement that requires us to sing only from the Psalms, seems akin to using Colossians 4:15, which says, “Give my greetings to the brothers at Laodicea, and to Nympha and the church in her house” as a requirement for churches to meet only in a woman’s house. 

4) One must assume that David, Asaph, Solomon, Moses, and others, did NOT write any other hymns that are not included in the canon. This seems unlikely, at best. Obviously, if they did (and I believe there were many others written), they were not inspired. It would then have to be argued that Israel was wrong to sing them.

I have several other reasons but it is late, and this has gone much longer than I planned. Thanks again for all the good reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, am sincerely grateful for the spirit of this debate, and for Bob for allowing it. It has helped me to better understand both sides.<br />
It is important that all who worship God have a reason for how and why they worship. Those who adhere to a Psalter only understanding of the regulative principle often bemoan, with good reason, those who will sing just about anything without a strong, biblical reason for doing so. I appreciate their willingness to stress this point.<br />
I believe in the regulative principle – that we must worship God in ways He has expressly prescribed - therefore, I must include in my worship of God new songs. </p>
<p>1) I believe the Bible commands us to sing our own songs to God.<br />
Some may say that the Scriptures do not tell us to sing “un-inspired” songs, but I believe they do. There are many examples of spontaneous singing of Praise to God in the Scriptures. Yet we are told that we must believe that those who sang spontaneous songs that were recorded were justified in doing so because they were inspired by the Holy Spirit. That is fine, but it is the flip side I have a problem with: we must believe that those who sang songs that were not recorded were all singing from the Psalter. So Miriam, Hannah, Deborah and Balak, Mary, Zachariah, and many others sang spontaneously, but Paul and Silas did not? It is precisely because of these examples, and because of commands from the Psalter itself (see  <a href="javascript://" title="Show/Hide Scripture" onclick="showhide_esv('scripturizer1441708874');">Psalm 149</a><span id="scripturizer1441708874" style="border-color: grey; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 5px; white-space: pre; display: none; padding: 5px; color: grey">Psalm 149<br />
  [149:1]Praise the LORD!<br />
  Sing to the LORD a new song,<br />
    his praise in the assembly of the godly!<br />
  [2]Let Israel be glad in his Maker;<br />
    let the children of Zion rejoice in their King!<br />
  [3]Let them praise his name with dancing,<br />
    making melody to him with tambourine and lyre!<br />
  [4]For the LORD takes pleasure in his people;<br />
    he adorns the humble with salvation.<br />
  [5]Let the godly exult in glory;<br />
    let them sing for joy on their beds.<br />
  [6]Let the high praises of God be in their throats<br />
    and two-edged swords in their hands,<br />
  [7]to execute vengeance on the nations<br />
    and punishments on the peoples,<br />
  [8]to bind their kings with chains<br />
    and their nobles with fetters of iron,<br />
  [9]to execute on them the judgment written!<br />
    This is honor for all his godly ones.<br />
  Praise the LORD!
<div style="text-align: right; font-size: 9px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.esv.org/">This text is from the ESV Bible. Visit www.esv.org to learn about the ESV.</a></div>
<p></span> – a command for spontaneous eruption of praise to God, even on our beds!) that I believe we must create new songs of praise to God, and do so in a humble spirit, acknowledging that they, like us, are imperfect, uninspired words and melodies. </p>
<p>2) It does not seem possible to maintain a consistency with this view without making a complete distinction between corporate worship and private worship. There are, no doubt, practical differences, but the differences should not be incompatible.<br />
I believe that the Scriptures teach that corporate worship should be the joining of many private worshipers. That is, those who worship God in private, seeking to join their voices together in worship as a unified body. It is the &#8220;two or three gathered together&#8221; principle.<br />
Even in Calvin&#8217;s introduction to the Genevan Psalter, he seems to argue that corporate worship (singing) should be a mirror of private worship (singing):<br />
&#8220;And yet the practice of singing may extend more widely; it is even in the homes and in the fields an incentive for us, as it were, an organ of praise to God,&#8230;&#8221;<br />
His distinction (made later) is rather with songs to “amuse” vs. songs of worship (a distinction most of us would agree with), not songs of private worship vs. songs of public worship.<br />
If one does see the two as completely different in all aspects, then, at least they can have some consistency, but I don’t see that in the Bible. I believe God deliberately did not tell us what to sing, just like he did not tell us other aspects of church worship and life.<br />
However, if one maintains that they are related, but believes that the regulative principle dictates Psalter only worship, then how can they consistently apply that principle other areas of church life and worship?<br />
How can they properly take the Lord&#8217;s Supper? They certainly cannot claim to take it in exactly the same manner as did Christ, or the early church (though few would deny it is an act of worship). Or&#8230; is it wrong to be baptized anywhere other than a river (which seems to be the only place of baptism mentioned in the Scriptures)? Why do we not meet on the Sabbath?</p>
<p>3) To use  <a href="javascript://" title="Show/Hide Scripture" onclick="showhide_esv('scripturizer1379371842');">2 Chronicles 29:30</a><span id="scripturizer1379371842" style="border-color: grey; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 5px; white-space: pre; display: none; padding: 5px; color: grey">2 Chronicles 29:30<br />
   [30]And Hezekiah the king and the officials commanded<br />
the Levites to sing praises to the LORD with the words of<br />
David and of Asaph the seer. And they sang praises with<br />
gladness, and they bowed down and worshiped. (ESV)
<div style="text-align: right; font-size: 9px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.esv.org/">This text is from the ESV Bible. Visit www.esv.org to learn about the ESV.</a></div>
<p></span> as a statement that requires us to sing only from the Psalms, seems akin to using  <a href="javascript://" title="Show/Hide Scripture" onclick="showhide_esv('scripturizer2114143984');">Colossians 4:15</a><span id="scripturizer2114143984" style="border-color: grey; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 5px; white-space: pre; display: none; padding: 5px; color: grey">Colossians 4:15<br />
   [15]Give my greetings to the brothers at Laodicea, and<br />
to Nympha and the church in her house. (ESV)
<div style="text-align: right; font-size: 9px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.esv.org/">This text is from the ESV Bible. Visit www.esv.org to learn about the ESV.</a></div>
<p></span>, which says, “Give my greetings to the brothers at Laodicea, and to Nympha and the church in her house” as a requirement for churches to meet only in a woman’s house. </p>
<p>4) One must assume that David, Asaph, Solomon, Moses, and others, did NOT write any other hymns that are not included in the canon. This seems unlikely, at best. Obviously, if they did (and I believe there were many others written), they were not inspired. It would then have to be argued that Israel was wrong to sing them.</p>
<p>I have several other reasons but it is late, and this has gone much longer than I planned. Thanks again for all the good reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cavman</title>
		<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2007/03/singing-the-psa-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>cavman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worshipmatters.com?p=275#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>I affirm the regulative principle.  But I fail to see a place in Scripture where it says "you shall sing these songs and no other".  Where does Scripture call this THE Hymnbook?
Scripture should regulate the content of the songs we sing.  Lyrics that do not conform to the teaching of Scripture should not be used.

Another question for Psalm singers: If we must only sing the Psalms, why do some change the Psalms to make them singable?  I find this in the Bible Song book that my denomination used to use (and many still love).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I affirm the regulative principle.  But I fail to see a place in Scripture where it says &#8220;you shall sing these songs and no other&#8221;.  Where does Scripture call this THE Hymnbook?<br />
Scripture should regulate the content of the songs we sing.  Lyrics that do not conform to the teaching of Scripture should not be used.</p>
<p>Another question for Psalm singers: If we must only sing the Psalms, why do some change the Psalms to make them singable?  I find this in the Bible Song book that my denomination used to use (and many still love).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary H</title>
		<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2007/03/singing-the-psa-1/#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worshipmatters.com?p=275#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>I'm impressed that there is such disagreement taking place with such love and respect.

It's obvious that we won't be convincing anyone at each end of the spectrum.

God is a gracious, loving and understanding God.  I truly believe that if one extreme is wrong, it won't result in any fall from grace or even God's rejecting of our heartfelt, loving response to our loving God, no matter the basis of our offering.  How could a  Father who operates in such grace reject gifts of the heart given by His children? (I guess one could argue that in my sincerity I could be sincerely wrong)

I didn't plan to, but I guess I've revealed my position.

I hope this makes sense.  It's the middle of the night right now after traveling from the States to Europe and I couldn't sleep.  I apologize for any incoherency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m impressed that there is such disagreement taking place with such love and respect.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s obvious that we won&#8217;t be convincing anyone at each end of the spectrum.</p>
<p>God is a gracious, loving and understanding God.  I truly believe that if one extreme is wrong, it won&#8217;t result in any fall from grace or even God&#8217;s rejecting of our heartfelt, loving response to our loving God, no matter the basis of our offering.  How could a  Father who operates in such grace reject gifts of the heart given by His children? (I guess one could argue that in my sincerity I could be sincerely wrong)</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t plan to, but I guess I&#8217;ve revealed my position.</p>
<p>I hope this makes sense.  It&#8217;s the middle of the night right now after traveling from the States to Europe and I couldn&#8217;t sleep.  I apologize for any incoherency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2007/03/singing-the-psa-1/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worshipmatters.com?p=275#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>2. I can follow the RPW and not have to qualify "new song".

What does that mean?

Sorry for asking so many questions, but I really am curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2. I can follow the RPW and not have to qualify &#8220;new song&#8221;.</p>
<p>What does that mean?</p>
<p>Sorry for asking so many questions, but I really am curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2007/03/singing-the-psa-1/#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worshipmatters.com?p=275#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>[quote]In the areas Scripture is clear - clear adherence is mandated - where it is not so clear - there is liberty. That is - liberty within the boundaries of the Scriptural mandate - what I believe has been determined as "circumstantial".[/quote]

and 

[quote]2 Chronicles 29:30, one of the chief texts upon which I rely for such assertions.[/quote]

I think most will agree that where Scripture is clear, it is clear, and we need to quickly adhere to scripture.  However, I am not personally seeing people trying to make a Scriptural mandate "circumstantial" as you describe it, rather the question is whether or not there IS such a scriptural mandate in the first place.  My tendency is to believe that you have not presented a compelling case that there is a scriptural mandate for exclusive psalmody.

Solid doctrine is rarely formed based on one verse of Scripture.  When it is (such as the case of, say, the Sixth Commandments prohibiting murder), it is clearly supported not only in the remainder of Scripture, but in the very character and nature of God Himself.  

In my admittedly limited view, I do not see a scriptural "Mandate" for exclusive psalmody.  My personal view is that this approach does not have sufficient Scriptural support, and is not supported by what I understand to be Character and Nature of God.  

Two practical thoughts / questions.

When the Disciples finished the Lord's Supper in the upper room, Matthew 26 tells us "And when they had sung a hymn, they went out to the Mount of Olives."  What hymn did they sing?  We're not told.  

My second question is:  If the Psalms are to be sung exclusively, what melodies are we to use?  What style should we sing in?  There are no notes or chords in the Bible.  If there is a mandate that we should sing only Psalms, then there should be a mandate that tells us HOW to sing the Psalms.  If the Psalms themselves alone are ordained to us for our Worship, then this seems to be the critical missing link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]In the areas Scripture is clear - clear adherence is mandated - where it is not so clear - there is liberty. That is - liberty within the boundaries of the Scriptural mandate - what I believe has been determined as &#8220;circumstantial&#8221;.[/quote]</p>
<p>and </p>
<p>[quote] <a href="javascript://" title="Show/Hide Scripture" onclick="showhide_esv('scripturizer329660601');">2 Chronicles 29:30</a><span id="scripturizer329660601" style="border-color: grey; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 5px; white-space: pre; display: none; padding: 5px; color: grey">2 Chronicles 29:30<br />
   [30]And Hezekiah the king and the officials commanded<br />
the Levites to sing praises to the LORD with the words of<br />
David and of Asaph the seer. And they sang praises with<br />
gladness, and they bowed down and worshiped. (ESV)
<div style="text-align: right; font-size: 9px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.esv.org/">This text is from the ESV Bible. Visit www.esv.org to learn about the ESV.</a></div>
<p></span>, one of the chief texts upon which I rely for such assertions.[/quote]</p>
<p>I think most will agree that where Scripture is clear, it is clear, and we need to quickly adhere to scripture.  However, I am not personally seeing people trying to make a Scriptural mandate &#8220;circumstantial&#8221; as you describe it, rather the question is whether or not there IS such a scriptural mandate in the first place.  My tendency is to believe that you have not presented a compelling case that there is a scriptural mandate for exclusive psalmody.</p>
<p>Solid doctrine is rarely formed based on one verse of Scripture.  When it is (such as the case of, say, the Sixth Commandments prohibiting murder), it is clearly supported not only in the remainder of Scripture, but in the very character and nature of God Himself.  </p>
<p>In my admittedly limited view, I do not see a scriptural &#8220;Mandate&#8221; for exclusive psalmody.  My personal view is that this approach does not have sufficient Scriptural support, and is not supported by what I understand to be Character and Nature of God.  </p>
<p>Two practical thoughts / questions.</p>
<p>When the Disciples finished the Lord&#8217;s Supper in the upper room,  <a href="javascript://" title="Show/Hide Scripture" onclick="showhide_esv('scripturizer1593673934');">Matthew 26</a><span id="scripturizer1593673934" style="border-color: grey; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 5px; white-space: pre; display: none; padding: 5px; color: grey">Matthew 26<br />
   [26:1]When Jesus had finished all these sayings, he said<br />
to his disciples, [2]"You know that after two days the<br />
Passover is coming, and the Son of Man will be delivered up<br />
to be crucified."<br />
   [3]Then the chief priests and the elders of the people<br />
gathered in the palace of the high priest, whose name was<br />
Caiaphas, [4]and plotted together in order to arrest Jesus<br />
by stealth and kill him. [5]But they said, "Not during the<br />
feast, lest there be an uproar among the people."<br />
   [6]Now when Jesus was at Bethany in the house of Simon<br />
the leper, [7]a woman came up to him with an alabaster<br />
flask of very expensive ointment, and she poured it on his<br />
head as he reclined at table. [8]And when the disciples saw<br />
it, they were indignant, saying, "Why this waste? [9]For<br />
this could have been sold for a large sum and given to the<br />
poor." [10]But Jesus, aware of this, said to them, "Why do<br />
you trouble the woman? For she has done a beautiful thing<br />
to me. [11]For you always have the poor with you, but you<br />
will not always have me. [12]In pouring this ointment on my<br />
body, she has done it to prepare me for burial. [13]Truly,<br />
I say to you, wherever this gospel is proclaimed in the<br />
whole world, what she has done will also be told in memory<br />
of her."<br />
   [14]Then one of the twelve, whose name was Judas<br />
Iscariot, went to the chief priests [15]and said, "What<br />
will you give me if I deliver him over to you?" And they<br />
paid him thirty pieces of silver. [16]And from that moment<br />
he sought an opportunity to betray him.<br />
   [17]Now on the first day of Unleavened Bread the<br />
disciples came to Jesus, saying, "Where will you have us<br />
prepare for you to eat the Passover?" [18]He said, "Go into<br />
the city to a certain man and say to him, 'The Teacher<br />
says, My time is at hand. I will keep the Passover at your<br />
house with my disciples.'" [19]And the disciples did as<br />
Jesus had directed them, and they prepared the Passover.<br />
   [20]When it was evening, he reclined at table with the<br />
twelve. [21]And as they were eating, he said, "Truly, I say<br />
to you, one of you will betray me." [22]And they were very<br />
sorrowful and began to say to him one after another, "Is it<br />
I, Lord?" [23]He answered, "He who has dipped his hand in<br />
the dish with me will betray me. [24]The Son of Man goes as<br />
it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom the Son<br />
of Man is betrayed! It would have been better for that man<br />
if he had not been born." [25]Judas, who would betray him,<br />
answered, "Is it I, Rabbi?" He said to him, "You have said<br />
so."<br />
   [26]Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after<br />
blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and<br />
said, "Take, eat; this is my body." [27]And he took a cup,<br />
and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, saying,<br />
"Drink of it, all of you, [28]for this is my blood of the<br />
covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness<br />
of sins. [29]I tell you I will not drink again of this<br />
fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with<br />
you in my Father's kingdom."<br />
   [30]And when they had sung a hymn, they went out to the<br />
Mount of Olives. [31]Then Jesus said to them, "You will all<br />
fall away because of me this night. For it is written, 'I<br />
will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock will<br />
be scattered.' [32]But after I am raised up, I will go<br />
before you to Galilee." [33]Peter answered him, "Though<br />
they all fall away because of you, I will never fall away."<br />
[34]Jesus said to him, "Truly, I tell you, this very night,<br />
before the rooster crows, you will deny me three times."<br />
[35]Peter said to him, "Even if I must die with you, I will<br />
not deny you!" And all the disciples said the same.<br />
   [36]Then Jesus went with them to a place called<br />
Gethsemane, and he said to his disciples, "Sit here, while<br />
I go over there and pray." [37]And taking with him Peter<br />
and the two sons of Zebedee, he began to be sorrowful and<br />
troubled. [38]Then he said to them, "My soul is very<br />
sorrowful, even to death; remain here, and watch with me."<br />
[39]And going a little farther he fell on his face and<br />
prayed, saying, "My Father, if it be possible, let this cup<br />
pass from me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as you<br />
will." [40]And he came to the disciples and found them<br />
sleeping. And he said to Peter, "So, could you not watch<br />
with me one hour? [41]Watch and pray that you may not enter<br />
into temptation. The spirit indeed is willing, but the<br />
flesh is weak." [42]Again, for the second time, he went<br />
away and prayed, "My Father, if this cannot pass unless I<br />
drink it, your will be done." [43]And again he came and<br />
found them sleeping, for their eyes were heavy. [44]So,<br />
leaving them again, he went away and prayed for the third<br />
time, saying the same words again. [45]Then he came to the<br />
disciples and said to them, "Sleep and take your rest later<br />
on. See, the hour is at hand, and the Son of Man is<br />
betrayed into the hands of sinners. [46]Rise, let us be<br />
going; see, my betrayer is at hand."<br />
   [47]While he was still speaking, Judas came, one of the<br />
twelve, and with him a great crowd with swords and clubs,<br />
from the chief priests and the elders of the people.<br />
[48]Now the betrayer had given them a sign, saying, "The<br />
one I will kiss is the man; seize him." [49]And he came up<br />
to Jesus at once and said, "Greetings, Rabbi!" And he<br />
kissed him. [50]Jesus said to him, "Friend, do what you<br />
came to do." Then they came up and laid hands on Jesus and<br />
seized him. [51]And behold, one of those who were with<br />
Jesus stretched out his hand and drew his sword and struck<br />
the servant of the high priest and cut off his ear.<br />
[52]Then Jesus said to him, "Put your sword back into its<br />
place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword.<br />
[53]Do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father, and he<br />
will at once send me more than twelve legions of angels?<br />
[54]But how then should the Scriptures be fulfilled, that<br />
it must be so?" [55]At that hour Jesus said to the crowds,<br />
"Have you come out as against a robber, with swords and<br />
clubs to capture me? Day after day I sat in the temple<br />
teaching, and you did not seize me. [56]But all this has<br />
taken place that the Scriptures of the prophets might be<br />
fulfilled." Then all the disciples left him and fled.<br />
   [57]Then those who had seized Jesus led him to Caiaphas<br />
the high priest, where the scribes and the elders had<br />
gathered. [58]And Peter was following him at a distance, as<br />
far as the courtyard of the high priest, and going inside<br />
he sat with the guards to see the end. [59]Now the chief<br />
priests and the whole Council were seeking false testimony<br />
against Jesus that they might put him to death, [60]but<br />
they found none, though many false witnesses came forward.<br />
At last two came forward [61]and said, "This man said, 'I<br />
am able to destroy the temple of God, and to rebuild it in<br />
three days.'" [62]And the high priest stood up and said,<br />
"Have you no answer to make? What is it that these men<br />
testify against you?" [63]But Jesus remained silent. And<br />
the high priest said to him, "I adjure you by the living<br />
God, tell us if you are the Christ, the Son of God."<br />
[64]Jesus said to him, "You have said so. But I tell you,<br />
from now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right<br />
hand of Power and coming on the clouds of heaven." [65]Then<br />
the high priest tore his robes and said, "He has uttered<br />
blasphemy. What further witnesses do we need? You have now<br />
heard his blasphemy. [66]What is your judgment?" They<br />
answered, "He deserves death." [67]Then they spit in his<br />
face and struck him. And some slapped him, [68]saying,<br />
"Prophesy to us, you Christ! Who is it that struck you?"<br />
   [69]Now Peter was sitting outside in the courtyard. And<br />
a servant girl came up to him and said, "You also were with<br />
Jesus the Galilean." [70]But he denied it before them all,<br />
saying, "I do not know what you mean." [71]And when he went<br />
out to the entrance, another servant girl saw him, and she<br />
said to the bystanders, "This man was with Jesus of<br />
Nazareth." [72]And again he denied it with an oath: "I do<br />
not know the man." [73]After a little while the bystanders<br />
came up and said to Peter, "Certainly you too are one of<br />
them, for your accent betrays you." [74]Then he began to<br />
invoke a curse on himself and to swear, "I do not know the<br />
man." And immediately the rooster crowed. [75]And Peter<br />
remembered the saying of Jesus, "Before the rooster crows,<br />
you will deny me three times." And he went out and wept<br />
bitterly. (ESV)
<div style="text-align: right; font-size: 9px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.esv.org/">This text is from the ESV Bible. Visit www.esv.org to learn about the ESV.</a></div>
<p></span> tells us &#8220;And when they had sung a hymn, they went out to the Mount of Olives.&#8221;  What hymn did they sing?  We&#8217;re not told.  </p>
<p>My second question is:  If the Psalms are to be sung exclusively, what melodies are we to use?  What style should we sing in?  There are no notes or chords in the Bible.  If there is a mandate that we should sing only Psalms, then there should be a mandate that tells us HOW to sing the Psalms.  If the Psalms themselves alone are ordained to us for our Worship, then this seems to be the critical missing link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2007/03/singing-the-psa-1/#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worshipmatters.com?p=275#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>Thanks. That helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. That helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2007/03/singing-the-psa-1/#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worshipmatters.com?p=275#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>Joel,

This occurs within the context of Hezekiah's reformation of worship which occurred during his reign. Only a few verses before, we read, "And he (Hezekiah) set the Levites in the house of the LORD with cymbals, with psalteries, and with harps, according to the commandment of David, and of Gad the king's seer, and Nathan the prophet: for so was the commandment of the LORD by his prophets" (v. 25). And just a few verses later, we read, "So the service of the house of the LORD was set in order" (v. 35). We must therefore see his command as an echo of the divine command to sing the Psalms. The full description of this reformation occurs in chapters 29 through 31. Chapter 31 concludes, "And thus did Hezekiah throughout all Judah, and wrought that which was good and right and truth before the LORD his God. And in every work that he began in the service of the house of God, and in the law, and in the commandments, to seek his God, he did it with all his heart, and prospered" (2 Chron. 31:20, 21).

Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel,</p>
<p>This occurs within the context of Hezekiah&#8217;s reformation of worship which occurred during his reign. Only a few verses before, we read, &#8220;And he (Hezekiah) set the Levites in the house of the LORD with cymbals, with psalteries, and with harps, according to the commandment of David, and of Gad the king&#8217;s seer, and Nathan the prophet: for so was the commandment of the LORD by his prophets&#8221; (v. 25). And just a few verses later, we read, &#8220;So the service of the house of the LORD was set in order&#8221; (v. 35). We must therefore see his command as an echo of the divine command to sing the Psalms. The full description of this reformation occurs in chapters 29 through 31. Chapter 31 concludes, &#8220;And thus did Hezekiah throughout all Judah, and wrought that which was good and right and truth before the LORD his God. And in every work that he began in the service of the house of God, and in the law, and in the commandments, to seek his God, he did it with all his heart, and prospered&#8221; ( <a href="javascript://" title="Show/Hide Scripture" onclick="showhide_esv('scripturizer1743592284');">2 Chron. 31:20, 21</a><span id="scripturizer1743592284" style="border-color: grey; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 5px; white-space: pre; display: none; padding: 5px; color: grey">2 Chronicles 31:20<br />
   [20]Thus Hezekiah did throughout all Judah, and he did<br />
what was good and right and faithful before the LORD his<br />
God. (ESV)
<div style="text-align: right; font-size: 9px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.esv.org/">This text is from the ESV Bible. Visit www.esv.org to learn about the ESV.</a></div>
<p></span>).</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2007/03/singing-the-psa-1/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worshipmatters.com?p=275#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>I am confused by the references to 2 Chron. 29:30.

That passage reads
Moreover Hezekiah the king and the princes commanded the Levites to sing praise unto the LORD with the words of David, and of Asaph the seer. And they sang praises with gladness, and they bowed their heads and worshipped.

This says that Hezekiah commanded this, not the LORD.

I don't read this as any type of commandment.

What am I missing?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confused by the references to  <a href="javascript://" title="Show/Hide Scripture" onclick="showhide_esv('scripturizer499745641');">2 Chron. 29:30</a><span id="scripturizer499745641" style="border-color: grey; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 5px; white-space: pre; display: none; padding: 5px; color: grey">2 Chronicles 29:30<br />
   [30]And Hezekiah the king and the officials commanded<br />
the Levites to sing praises to the LORD with the words of<br />
David and of Asaph the seer. And they sang praises with<br />
gladness, and they bowed down and worshiped. (ESV)
<div style="text-align: right; font-size: 9px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.esv.org/">This text is from the ESV Bible. Visit www.esv.org to learn about the ESV.</a></div>
<p></span>.</p>
<p>That passage reads<br />
Moreover Hezekiah the king and the princes commanded the Levites to sing praise unto the LORD with the words of David, and of Asaph the seer. And they sang praises with gladness, and they bowed their heads and worshipped.</p>
<p>This says that Hezekiah commanded this, not the LORD.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t read this as any type of commandment.</p>
<p>What am I missing?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
