<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q&#038;A Friday - What About the Regulative Principle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worshipmatters.com/2006/02/qa-friday-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2006/02/qa-friday-what/</link>
	<description>Resources for Leading Worship from Bob Kauflin</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.worshipmatters.com/2006/02/qa-friday-what/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worshipmatters.com?p=97#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Bob - as one who comes from a tradition which embraces the regulative principle one of the things I have found helpful is a discussion of how God's Word governs worship. I believe it is Scotty Smith, but maybe some others, who have said that God's Word may command the way we worship in one of three ways - 1) by explicit command, 2) by principle (i.e. good and necessary inference) and 3) by example. 

This way of looking at it still maintains the element/circumstance distinction and I think it opens the regulative principle up a bit, making it less restrictive. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob - as one who comes from a tradition which embraces the regulative principle one of the things I have found helpful is a discussion of how God&#8217;s Word governs worship. I believe it is Scotty Smith, but maybe some others, who have said that God&#8217;s Word may command the way we worship in one of three ways - 1) by explicit command, 2) by principle (i.e. good and necessary inference) and 3) by example. </p>
<p>This way of looking at it still maintains the element/circumstance distinction and I think it opens the regulative principle up a bit, making it less restrictive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
